YOUR FUNDRAISERS SUCK!
If you ask your team to sell crappy, cheap bracelets – your fundraisers suck.
If you have them stand in the middle of the street promoting half-naked car washes – your Fundraisers suck.
If you ever lost money on a fundraiser – your fundraisers suck.
If you have them selling over-priced chicken sandwiches that a company dropped off in a cow outfit and they are called and you had to pay upfront and promised you all the revenues after you cover your expenses – and then it rains and nobody shows up to the football game where you were selling them….
If you are helping your local sports team hock their worst seats to their lowest-attended games (usually on school nights… at like 8 p.m. on a Tuesday! Go team) – well, you get the picture.
Point is this. Some companies think schools are stupid. Not the physical building, but you.
I know that stings and it hurts me too but you have to address the issue here. They know you are over-worked and under-appreciated. Stressed out and underpaid. You don’t have the time and resources to sit around making cold calls to raise money or the energy to develop amazing fundraisers that will get television coverage. So these companies sit around board rooms and come up with programs that have you sell their product, service, or brand for them and you see what minimalism truly is.
Here’s why they love you:
You’re Kids are Great Salespeople – they are free labor and (mostly) cute. In the business world, you can’t hire and fire by looks and, let’s face it, the older we get the uglier we are. You also definitely won’t get buy in the business world having somebody peddle your wares for free. But somebody came up with the word fundraising and the tables were cleared.
There’s a “Cause” Involved - Cause Marketing is, according to Alden Keene’s definition of cause marketing: “a relationship that bridges commerce and cause in ways that benefit both parties.”
This is only true to a point. When a company asks you to sell yo-yo’s to raise money for your tennis program and they’re going to give you 2% of all the profits (after they take out their marketing and shipping costs) and you have to handle:
• Distributing all the product to the students
• Promoting the fundraiser with signage, etc
• Keeping track of the inventory
• Handling the cash
• Handling unsold product
• Taking the risk
It’s not worth it. And, to boot, at the end of it all, you and your team invested dozens of hours and maybe even some money up front for $26 dollars.
The Cone Millennial Cause Study in 2006 showed that 89% of Americans (aged 13 to 25) would switch from one brand to another brand of a comparable product (and price) if the latter brand was associated with a "good cause".
Companies know that they need to align with a cause. I’m just saying be selective. The company you partner with is going to walk-away with many benefits while you burden the cost and responsibility of making the program go.
Free media exposure (they may not give you much money but they’ll pay their PR firm plenty to ensure that every media outlet in town is there when the program starts, when it finishes, and when the big fake check gets presented to your school). Some companies do this with poor communities and there is actually a name for this: Poverty-pimping. When you see those photo opp’s of politicians reading to an impoverished kid in a poor neighborhood; that’s poverty-pimping.
Free brand alignment with your school and your highly-desirable parent (consumer) Companies love getting their product in your hands or in the hands of your students or in the hands of your parents as much as car companies love getting you to sit in their car.
Solutions to improve your fundraisers –
One At A Time – Do not do multiple fundraisers at one time. If you can prevent it, don’t do a fundraiser overlapping with another group’s fundraiser either. Keep it simple and don’t dilute your message.
Brand alignment – Align your school or program with an appropriate and established company. That hurts your schools and destroys the value of your brand. That’s right… imagine you are Nike or the Yankees. They aren’t going to align with something that doesn’t fit what they want you to think about them.
Quit Taking Free Stuff – Companies will give you free stuff and then you’re in their pocket. Anytime they can go around giving your school real money, they most likely will.
Demand a base fee – Ask companies for a set minimum donation up front. If you don’t sell the 2,500 bird feeders that they promised you 6.5% of, then you still get X amount of dollars. Put a value on the time it will take your school to distribute the information, the number of people that will receive the information, and how much money the potential partnering company stands to make.
Look, I’m not saying get greedy but with the pressure and budgetary restraints we’re all under, let’s start getting our fair share. Good luck and, as always, if you have any questions or want additional help, contact me directly at brian_siatkowski@yahoo.com.
Showing posts with label cause marketing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cause marketing. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Sunday, March 9, 2008
Is Dove For Real?
Dove has a campaign called "Campaign For Real Beauty" and it's supposed to help the self-esteem of millions of teenage girls to free them from the restraints of the beauty industry. To let them know: You have real beauty.
That's right. You have real beauty before you buy your $20 shampoo. Before you put on that eye liner, and lipstick, and blush, and foundation, and eye shadow, and lip liner, and anti-shine cream.
You have real beauty and Dove (owned by Unilever) thinks it's about time you knew it.... Of course, the problem some industry experts see here is that Dove (eh, owned by Unilever) is the mass marketer and producer of most of these industry products.
Nonetheless, the campaign has been a searing success so far. Dove has released two very well-done, and sometimes criticized, commercials for their campaign. To really get the feel, you got to take a look....
Dove "Evolution" commercial http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYhCn0jf46U&NR=1
Dove "Onslaught" commercial http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaH4y6ZjSfE
Those are some pretty heavy commercials. Pow! Right in your face, especially "Onslaught," it's like hey everybody out there is talking to your kids about looking good and we're going to sell the crap out of her if you don't take a stance.
So, there's the tyranny of the situation. The Yin and Yang aren't really panning out on this one. I mean should we mind that Unilever also produces the Axe commercials? I guess we should distinguish between the product branding of both Dove and Axe.
But, here's what we're learning in advertising school about using information systems to get your products point across:
A) It works - more people are increasing the amount of time they spend watching online videos - that includes product commercials. After watching "Onslaught" I actually took myself to ITunes and did one more consumer step: I bought Simian's La Breeze (which just so happens to be the commercials music soundtrack.)
B) It can reach lots of people - As of March 2, 2008, when I just checked www.youtube.com, The "Onslaught" video had rung up 1.3 million views. That's not bad for free press. As for "Evolution," 6,232,000 views and counting! That's just unfair. Spell it: F. R. E. E. advertising
C) You're going to open yourself up to criticism. I also noticed plenty of professional and not-so professional knock off videos which were actually worth seeing as well.
Either way, you decide on this one - let me know. My thoughts are that you can't fault a company for trying to get involved in something "bigger." Whether that's the Internet or the cause they are supporting. Everybody is trying to make something bigger. Using information systems like the Internet, companies, campaigns, television shows are all becoming bigger than real life.
That's right. You have real beauty before you buy your $20 shampoo. Before you put on that eye liner, and lipstick, and blush, and foundation, and eye shadow, and lip liner, and anti-shine cream.
You have real beauty and Dove (owned by Unilever) thinks it's about time you knew it.... Of course, the problem some industry experts see here is that Dove (eh, owned by Unilever) is the mass marketer and producer of most of these industry products.
Nonetheless, the campaign has been a searing success so far. Dove has released two very well-done, and sometimes criticized, commercials for their campaign. To really get the feel, you got to take a look....
Dove "Evolution" commercial http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYhCn0jf46U&NR=1
Dove "Onslaught" commercial http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaH4y6ZjSfE
Those are some pretty heavy commercials. Pow! Right in your face, especially "Onslaught," it's like hey everybody out there is talking to your kids about looking good and we're going to sell the crap out of her if you don't take a stance.
So, there's the tyranny of the situation. The Yin and Yang aren't really panning out on this one. I mean should we mind that Unilever also produces the Axe commercials? I guess we should distinguish between the product branding of both Dove and Axe.
But, here's what we're learning in advertising school about using information systems to get your products point across:
A) It works - more people are increasing the amount of time they spend watching online videos - that includes product commercials. After watching "Onslaught" I actually took myself to ITunes and did one more consumer step: I bought Simian's La Breeze (which just so happens to be the commercials music soundtrack.)
B) It can reach lots of people - As of March 2, 2008, when I just checked www.youtube.com, The "Onslaught" video had rung up 1.3 million views. That's not bad for free press. As for "Evolution," 6,232,000 views and counting! That's just unfair. Spell it: F. R. E. E. advertising
C) You're going to open yourself up to criticism. I also noticed plenty of professional and not-so professional knock off videos which were actually worth seeing as well.
Either way, you decide on this one - let me know. My thoughts are that you can't fault a company for trying to get involved in something "bigger." Whether that's the Internet or the cause they are supporting. Everybody is trying to make something bigger. Using information systems like the Internet, companies, campaigns, television shows are all becoming bigger than real life.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)